The Christian Legacy of A Cappella Music In Divine Worship
By Harlan Sorrell
Did you know that instrumental music was
not introduced into so-called Christian worship until quite late in the
Roman Catholic apostasy, and even then the Catholic Church accepted it
reluctantly? The Greek Orthodox Church never accepted mechanical instruments
into their worship at all, and it is evident that the Protestant reformers
removed them from worship. The word “a cappella” is an Italian word, coming
from two Latin words, “a” meaning “according to,” and “cappella” meaning
“chapel.” Webster defines “a cappella” thus: “In the style of church or chapel
music; especially in the old style, without accompaniment.” It is a fact of
history that this was the style of church music from apostolic times. The proof
can be found in the writings of the early church fathers.
There are very
few people of the present generation who realize that the general use of
mechanical instruments, even in the worship services of so-called “evangelical
churches,” is something that has evolved, for the most part, over the past 150
years. Prior to this, the use of instrumental music in worship was almost
unknown to Protestantism, and could only be found among the most liberal and
“worldly” classes of Protestant congregations. Charles Spurgeon, a renowned
Baptist minister of the 19th century has been quoted as saying,
“Israel was at school, and used childish things to help her to learn; but in
these days when Jesus gives us spiritual food, one can make melody without
strings and pipes. We do not need them. They would hinder rather than help
our praise. Sing unto Him. This is the sweetest and best music. There is no
instrument like the human voice. What a degradation to supplant the intelligent
song of the whole congregation by the blowing off of wind from inanimate
bellows and pipes! We might as well pray by machinery as praise by it.” It is
said that Spurgeon preached to 20,000 people every Sunday for 20 years in the
Metropolitan Baptist Tabernacle and never were mechanical instruments of music
used in his services. When asked why, he quoted 1 Cor. 14:15: “I will pray with
the spirit and I will pray with the understanding also; I will sing with the
spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also.” He then declared, “I
would as soon pray to God with machinery as to sing to God with machinery.”
It is a fact that mechanical instruments
serve as “crutches” for singing. I have found it interesting in visiting the
worship services of different kinds and brands of “churches” to note that,
where mechanical instruments are used the most, the singing is generally the
poorest and the shallowest. But among those groups where mechanical instruments
in worship have been omitted, the quality of the singing usually seems better,
being enhanced by vocal harmony. Even children learn to sing in harmony and
make beautiful music with their voices at a young age when they are able to
hear all the harmonizing parts sung. And naturally so: would children ever learn
to walk properly if we taught them from childhood that in order to walk they
must use crutches? No, they learn to balance themselves and walk better without
using crutches. It works the same with singing. A better ear is developed for
the balance of harmony without the crutch of an instrument. The old-time
Baptist preacher, Charles Spurgeon, spoke correctly and accurately when he said
mechanical instruments “hinder rather than help our praise.” The sweetest music
that has ever been heard on earth is the voices of saints blending in rich,
harmonious tones as they sing in the Spirit. Such music has a heavenly ring
that charms and thrills the pure in heart as well as draws the attention of
sinners. It actually sounds angelic!
[Note: to experience a taste of this, I highly recommend attending the
national camp meeting of the Church of God, held annually at Monark Springs,
(Neosho), Missouri, starting each year on the third Friday in July.]
With the exception of some that may have
lacked understanding of this issue from their beginning, it appears that most
Protestant movements adopted mechanical instruments into their worship services
after they lost the fundamental vision of their earliest leaders and
degenerated from their original spiritual environment. The degeneration has
progressed to the point that today, it seems, most so-called worship services
consist of little more than “entertainment” and fleshly appeal, leaving the
present generation of people with no clue to what the music of real spiritual
worship is like. This is especially unfortunate for the youth of our time. The
loss of fundamental, wholesome church music that has taken place over the past
100 years, and especially the past 50 years has stifled the influence of
genuine Christianity in the earth. A few conservative minority groups, however,
still hold the original Christian tradition of a cappella music in
worship. On occasions when today’s youth do get the rare opportunity to hear it
they are usually amazed, and often say, “I’ve never heard singing like
this!” I remember a woman who, after
attending the Monark Springs camp meeting (mentioned above) for her first time,
stated that the singing sounded to her like angels. There is indeed something
very unique and special about the harmonious blending of human voices singing
praises to God out of the depths of pure hearts that no other kind or style of
music can come close to imitating. It carries a heavenly aura.
The Dispensational Difference
All who study
the scriptures and church history in depth know why the apostolic church never
used mechanical instruments and why the Anabaptists as well as reformers like
Martin Luther, John Wesley, and many others, including D. S. Warner,
rejected their use in spiritual worship. They used musical instruments to aid
the composing of written music for their songs, or for personal or social
enjoyment, but they rejected their use in “worship” because they understood the
principles taught in John 4:23-24 and Acts 17:24-25, etc. To them, worship was
the outpouring of the “inner man,” whether in prayer, preaching, or song.
Mechanical instruments in spiritual worship were considered out of place. As
history states concerning the primitive Christians, they “were of too spiritual
a fiber to substitute lifeless instruments for, or use them to accompany, the
human voice.” There is no sweeter music on earth than the perfect blending of
human voices in four-part harmony. Unfortunately, the majority of the populace
of today’s world has never had the opportunity to hear this kind of superb,
heavenly music. It touches and inspires the soul like no other.
But some have
supposed that because the Jews used musical instruments in their worship and,
because it is even commanded in various places in the Psalms of David, that the
early Christians, therefore, must have used them too. But in this they lack
insight. All scripture must be interpreted and applied according to its
dispensational context. In Psalm 144:1, David says, “Blessed be the LORD my
strength, which teacheth my hands to war, and my fingers to fight.” It is true
that God blessed David in all his wars and fighting, and helped him to kill and
destroy his enemies. But that is foreign to the Gospel dispensation. God now
requires us to cease from wars and fighting and to love our enemies and do good
to those who hate us and despitefully use us, and to “resist not evil.” (Matt.
5:38-45). God allowed David to also have multiple wives, and blessed him and
the offspring he brought forth by those wives. But God condemns such a practice
in the present dispensation and will never bless any man who should follow
David’s example. Therefore all scripture must be interpreted and applied
according to its dispensational context. This holds true relative to Psalm
150:3-8, and other Psalms that command the use of musical instruments or
dancing in worship to God. No Old Testament text can annul any New Testament
doctrine or principle. The New Testament is the “better testament,” and is the
one God requires us to live by today.
Yes, David, in his dispensation was “a man
after God’s own heart.” But he who would be a man after God’s own heart in this
dispensation must rise to a much higher plane than David ever knew or had the
privilege of knowing. We must now be raised up to sit with Christ in
heavenly places in the Spirit. This is the plane where all true and acceptable
worship now takes place. This kind of worship can neither be ceremonially
nor mechanically produced, but only takes place by the interaction of the human
spirit with the divine Spirit. We sing, pray, and prophesy (preach) in the
Spirit, having New Testament authority to include all this in our worship. But
we find no New Testament injunction for “playing” in the Spirit. The Holy
Spirit only anoints the music that flows from the inner human spirit and soul.
God has no interest or delight in that music we may produce by skillful hands.
It is the vibrations and incense of the melodies of our hearts that He desires
to hear and smell.
“The Lord once dwelt
in temples made with hands,
And had one people,
Israel’s chosen bands;
And at Jerusalem, in
formal ways,
Was worshiped by the
just of olden days.”
But better things
than these God had in store,
When ordinances of
old should be no more [Heb. 9:10],
And He should dwell within
man’s inward parts,
And worship be the
incense of our hearts.
There are those
who feel that to remove the use of musical instruments from their worship
services would negate the quality of their worship services. But that is not
the case at all, if the services are led and inspired by the Holy Spirit.
The quality of a worship service is actually enhanced when the mechanical
element is removed from it and the service becomes the outflow of a
spiritual communion flow between the spirits of the worshipers and the
Spirit of God. It is then that we get to hear the sound that God is interested
in hearing – the melody and harmony that pours forth from hearts tuned to His
Spirit and vibrating with chords of divine life and glory. God didn’t remove
the formality and ceremonialism of the Old Testament to leave us with something
inferior. He gave us something MUCH BETTER! A cappella music in divine worship
should never be viewed as an imposition, but rather as a priceless legacy
from the purest days of primitive Christianity.
Consider the following quotations:
“There can be
no doubt that originally that music of the divine service was everywhere
entirely of a vocal nature.” – Emil Numan, The History of Music.
“We have no
real knowledge of the exact character of the music which formed a part of the
religious devotion of the first Christian congregation. It was, however, purely
vocal.” – Dr. Frederic Louis Ritter.
“Only singing,
however, and no playing of instruments was permitted in the early church.” – Hugo
Leichtentritt.
“The music they
used, reproduced the spirit of their religion – an inward quietude. All the
music employed in their early services was vocal.” – F. L. Humphrey’s Evolution
of Church Music.
“It
(instrumental music) was only permitted to the Jews, as sacrifice was, for the
heaviness and grossness of their souls. God condescended to their weakness,
because they were lately drawn off from idols; but now, instead of organs, we
may use our own bodies to praise him withal. Instruments appertain not to Christians.”
– John Chrysostom (345 – 407 A.D), Church Father, Eastern/Greek. (Homily on
Psalm 149 & Comments on Psalm 150.
“Music in churches is as ancient as the
apostles, but instrumental music not so.” – Joseph Bingham, Works
Vol. III, page 137.
“The Christian
community held the same view, as we know from the apostolic and post-apostolic
literature: instrumental music was thought unfit for religious services; the
Christian sources are quite outspoken in their condemnation of instrumental
performances. Originally, only song was considered worthy of direct approach to
Divinity.” – The New Oxford History of Music (The Music of Post Biblical
Judaism, Vol. I, Page 135).
“The general introduction of instrumental
music can certainly not be assigned to an earlier date than the fifth century –
the first organ is believed to have been used in Church service in the
thirteenth century. The early reformers, when they came out of Rome, removed
them as monuments of idolatry.” – McClintock and Strong’s Encyclopedia.
“Pope Vitalian
is related to have first introduced organs into some of the churches of western
Europe about 670 A.D.” – The American Encyclopedia, Vol. 12, page 688.
“In the Greek
(Catholic) Church the organ never came into use. But after the eighth century
it became more and more common in the Latin Church, not, however, without
opposition from the side of the monks. … The Roman Catholic Church began
adopting musical instruments during the Middle Ages, but the Greek church in
the East continued to reject them; and even as late as the sixteenth century
there was enough protest within the Roman church that the Council of Trent
(1545) came very close to abolishing their use. Catholic churches finally began
using instrumental music (usually an organ) during the Middle Ages, but it was
largely opposed as unscriptural and was slow to gain acceptance. Not until the
1200’s could it be found in widespread use” – Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia,
Vol 2, page 1702.
“The organ in
the worship is the insignia of Baal. The Roman Catholics borrowed it from the
Jews.” – Martin Luther (1483 – 1536 A.D.) [McClintock & Strong’s
Encyclopedia, Vol. I, page 762].
“Musical instruments in celebrating the
praises of God would be no more suitable than the burning of incense, the
lighting of lamps, and the restoration of other shadows of the law.” – Presbyterian
founder.
“I am an old
minister and I here declare that I never knew them (musical instruments) to be
productive of any good in the worship of God, and I have reason to believe they
are productive of much evil. Music, as a science, I esteem and admire, but
instrumental music in the house of God I abominate and abhor.” – Adam Clarke.
“… Those who
know the church of God best, and what constitutes its genuine spiritual state,
know that these things (mechanical instruments of music) have been introduced
as a substitute for the life and power of religion; and that where they prevail
most, there is least of the power of Christianity. Away with such portentous
baubles from the worship of that infinite Spirit who requires His followers to
worship Him in spirit and truth, for to no such worship are these instruments
friendly.” – Adam Clarke, Clarke’s Commentary, Vol. II, pp. 690-691.
“I have no
objection to instruments being in our chapels, provided they are neither heard
nor seen.” – John Wesley, 1729.
“But one may
ask, ‘Is there anything really wrong with one washing his hands before he eats
his food?’ Morally, no; religiously yes. An activity can be morally right and
yet be religiously wrong. Consider the following: (1) It is morally right to
eat ham and eggs, but it is wrong to do so as a religious rite, as an act of
worship. (2) It is morally right to apply water to an infant’s body for the
purpose of bathing it, but it is wrong to do so as a religious rite. (3) It is
morally right to play an instrument of music for recreation and entertainment,
but it is wrong to do so in the worship of God.” – Author & date anonymous.
Question: “Is it right to have an organ or other
instrumental music in church services?
Answer: ““No. Jesus never introduced instrumental music into the worship
of Christians. And the burden of the evening light is to bring the worship of
God in every particular back to the standard Jesus lifted up. Appeals are often
made by those who would justify the use of instruments in public to the various
texts throughout the Old Testament, which speaks of the Jews worshipping God on
various kinds of musical instruments. But let it be remembered, that although
the Jews worshipped God upon instruments, such worship was no part of the
original Levitical worship, and was not commanded by Moses. Hence it appears
that instrumental music in the Old as well as the New Testament does not
properly belong to the public worship of God. We believe that musical
instruments are alright in their place, but their place is outside of the
public worship of the saints.” --
William G. Schell [songwriter, author, and co-laborer with D. S. Warner], The
Gospel Trumpet, January 30, 1896, page 2, Questions.
“Having been a
fond lover of instrumental music, I have always protested against the idea of
abandoning our organ in the Missions. Many dear brethren have admonished me on
the same, but I have resisted by quoting the Psalmist’s expressions on music,
and felt it was not only right but [also] scriptural. But while in England, I
came across this letter, written by a godly man of his time, which I send to the
Trumpet. After reading it I have become thoroughly convinced that we
must worship God with our voices, and not with instruments; and I feel that the
following will be a benefit to the rest of God’s little ones. I thank God for
the truth and light, and I shall never use an instrument in our worship again.
This letter is copied from a book entitled ‘Controversy of Zion,’ by Dr. T.
Christe:
“ ‘Things
insignificant in themselves often involve great principles. Your correspondent
at the little Independent chapel at Parton thinks that matters there never
looked so cheerful as at present, and amongst the sources of his joy he tells
us, that on Sabbath last the notes of a flutina-concertina gave him
great assistance in making a joyful noise unto the Lord. This is
a melancholy admission, that the notes of a dead musical instrument, composed
of wood and air, and elicited by the fingers of another, are needful to help
his infirmities and teach his soul to worship the living God. But he goes
further, and assuming that his concertina-flutina is of divine warranty, raises
the whole question of instrumental music in Christian worship, as though it had
never before been discussed, and wonders that any should be so insensate to
melody, and so ignorant of scripture as to differ from him. He says, ‘It seems
strange to us that David should say, Praise the Lord with harp; sing unto
him with the psaltery and an instrument with ten strings; sing unto him a new
song; play skillfully with a loud noise: and that there should be those who
object to the instrumental music in a place of worship.’
“ ‘Is the
writer aware that this was precisely the position taken by Archbishop Land and
the Star Chamber against the Puritans, Independents, etc., in the days of the
first Charles, and in that fearful struggle for freedom of speech and of person
which we now enjoy? Is he aware that a lawyer, a physician, and a minister –
Burton, Prynne, and Bostwick – were seized and tried by that Romanizing prelate
and that wicked tribunal for, amongst other things, their exposal of the
unscriptural character of church music? …
“ ‘I now
condense a few thoughts on the scriptural view of the subject, and at once meet
your correspondent’s question by asking another – Would it seem strange to him
if his new pastor slew bullocks and rams, sheep and oxen, turtle doves and
pigeons, next Sabbath in the little chapel at Parton and then proceeded to
sprinkle with blood, the book and the people, and the concertina-flutina, as
well as to burn incense from his pulpit of wood? Yet this would be just as
reasonably founded on the scripture he quotes as can the use of instruments of
music in Christian worship.’” – Submitted by G. Tufts, Jr., Published in The
Gospel Trumpet, November 25, 1897, page 2, under the heading, Church
Music, (Abbreviated Quote).
Question: “Have we a right to worship with
drums and horns? – W. H. C. Answer: “No; it is not right to use drums or horns,
or any other musical instrument in religious worship. The Jewish people used to
blow horns sometimes in worship, but that is done away with the law of Moses.
The use of musical instruments was never instituted by Christ, and never
practiced by any of his apostles; hence forms no part of Christian worship. It
belongs to the worship of formalists, and is never used except where worship is
drifting into formalism. It is the Spirit of God that puts the sweetness in our
singing, and truly spiritual people want nothing but the Spirit of God to help
them make a joyful sound in singing the praises of God.” – William G. Schell, The
Gospel Trumpet, September 15, 1898, page 5, Questions Answered.
Question:
“Is it right to worship God with organ and choir? Did Jesus teach any
such thing in the New Testament? Answer:
No. Jesus never taught anything in favor of musical instruments and choir in
divine worship. The entire New Testament is silent on this subject. Not one
word indicates any mechanical worship in the church of God. The church is God’s
organ; each individual member is a key; the Holy Spirit is the operator. When
he touches a key it gives its individual and distinct sound, which blends in
beautiful harmony and praise and true heart worship to God, expressed in
inspired living words. Worshiping by machinery is certainly foreign to the
church of God.” – J. W. Byers, The Gospel Trumpet, September 29, 1904, Questions
Answered, pages 4 & 5.
“Ministers who are full of the Holy Ghost
and wisdom and miracle-working faith and power, will not need such things [as
superfluous articles of dress], neither pianos, nor stringed instruments
to get an audience and to convert souls. Worldliness in dress, theater-going,
fashions, and pride, have robbed or helped to rob many a spiritual church of
its glory and power, and then followed the substitution of musical
instruments for the thanksgiving and praises and psalms of the lips unto God.” -- J. E. Forrest, contributing editor for The
Gospel Trumpet, December 19, 1912, page 5, article The Christian’s Dress.
“He (D. S. Warner) taught plainly and
forcibly against the use of musical instruments in the worship of God. None of
the congregations [of the Church of God] used them in his day.” – C. E. Orr, in
Not a New Movement.
D. S. Warner’s teaching on this
subject, as well as all other doctrines, was no novelty, but was simply in
keeping with the mainstream of fundamental, orthodox Christianity. Other quotations from early Gospel Trumpet
publications could be given, but these sufficiently reveal the original
stance of the Church of God on this subject.